I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
为应对内存涨价，手机厂商预计会采取多重举措：降低出货目标以保住利润，调整其他器件的规格以对冲成本，以及上调终端产品零售价格。群智咨询预计，同规格或类似规格的产品价格会上涨10%到20%。。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Ранее стало известно, что Владимир Путин поручил активнее привлекать участников специальной военной операции (СВО) к разработке, производству, эксплуатации и обслуживанию беспилотных технологий.，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
Small Business USA