Complete coverage
Superhuman has taken its writing assistant Grammarly on quite the merry-go-round ride regarding its approach to AI tools. In August, the company launched a feature called Expert Review that would offer feedback on your writing, offering AI-generated feedback that would appear to come from a famous writer or academic of note. These recreations were based on "publicly available information from third-party LLMs," which sounds a lot like web crawlers of dubious legality were involved.
。wps对此有专业解读
These experiments suggest less “slightly worse model” and more “genuine brain damage.” Which makes sense under the circuit model — duplicating the wrong circuit is like enlarging a specific region of the brain at the expense of its neighbours. You don’t get a uniformly dumber person. You get someone with a specific neurological deficit. The cowboy model might have had its “social appropriateness” circuit disrupted by a doubled “creativity” circuit running unchecked. The stuttering models might have had their decoding circuits pushed out of alignment by extra reasoning depth they couldn’t translate back into coherent tokens.
The Daily Dot reached out to learn more.